Technology & AI
Radzivon Alkhovik
Sep 15, 2025
Over 300 million users work daily in Microsoft Teams, but a growing number of organizations are considering Jitsi as an alternative to gain complete independence from corporate ecosystems, significant budget savings, and control over corporate data. However, the choice between open-source freedom and a ready-made corporate platform can determine an organization's IT strategy for years to come.
Hello! The mymeet.ai team has tested both platforms in corporate conditions and compiled a detailed comparison of Jitsi vs Microsoft Teams. We'll show the real advantages of each solution for making an informed decision between independence and integration.
Jitsi or Microsoft Teams: Two Approaches to Corporate Communications
Jitsi and Microsoft Teams represent diametrically opposite philosophies for building corporate communications — open independence versus integrated ecosystem.
Fundamental Difference Between Jitsi and Teams
Understanding the basic principles of each platform is critically important for choosing an organization's long-term strategy.
Jitsi — Open Corporate Independence.
The platform is created as a completely independent solution without ties to specific vendors. Full control over data and infrastructure, transparency of all processes, absence of hidden information collection mechanisms, freedom to choose additional tools.
Microsoft Teams — Integrated Corporate Ecosystem.
Teams is a key component of Microsoft 365 with deep integration of all business processes. Unified ecosystem for communications, document management, project management with centralized administration.
Target Audience of Platforms
Each platform was created to solve the needs of different types of organizations.
Jitsi is oriented toward: organizations valuing technological independence, companies with their own IT expertise, projects with limited licensing budgets, international teams without ties to specific ecosystems, government organizations with data sovereignty requirements.
Microsoft Teams is oriented toward: corporations already using Microsoft 365, organizations without their own IT department, companies needing comprehensive business process automation, teams with intensive collaborative document work.
Jitsi vs Teams: Feature Comparison
Detailed feature comparison will help understand which platform better meets your organization's needs.
Implementation and Usage Simplicity
Let's evaluate entry barriers and complexity of mastering each platform.
Jitsi: Maximum implementation simplicity — just send a meet.jit.si link to participants. Requires no corporate account creation, corporate software installation, or complex settings. Participants connect with one click without prior preparation.
Teams: Requires Microsoft 365 subscription and corporate account creation for all users. Complex interfaces with numerous functions can confuse new users. Deep integration requires time to master all capabilities.
Advantage: Jitsi — ensures instant implementation without administrative barriers.
Data Control and Independence
A critically important aspect for organizations valuing technological sovereignty.
Jitsi: Complete independence from corporate vendors with self-hosted deployment. Open-source code ensures transparency of all processes. Ability to store all corporate data on its own infrastructure without transferring to Microsoft.
Teams: All corporate data is processed in Microsoft cloud with application of their corporate policies. Limited control over location and processing of confidential information. Dependence on Microsoft decisions.
Advantage: Jitsi — provides complete technological sovereignty.
Economic Efficiency
Let's compare real ownership costs of each platform for different team sizes.
Jitsi: Completely free for meet.jit.si use. Self-hosted deployment requires only investment in server infrastructure ($100-300/month) and administration. JaaS from $0.05 per participant-minute.
Teams: Requires Microsoft 365 subscription from $6/month per user for basic functions. Full functionality available in plans from $12.50/month per user.
For a 50-person team per year:
Jitsi: $0 (public) or $2000-5000 (self-hosted)
Teams: $7500 (Microsoft 365 Business Standard)
Advantage: Jitsi — cardinal corporate budget savings.
Communication Functionality
Let's compare capabilities for effective corporate communications.
Jitsi: Focus on quality video conferencing: HD video, screen sharing, chat, virtual backgrounds, recording. Additional functions added through integrations and API. Breakout rooms in enterprise deployments.
Teams: Comprehensive corporate platform: video conferencing, persistent team channels, Office document integration, task scheduler, corporate phone, web applications.
Advantage: Teams — significantly broader corporate platform functionality.
Jitsi vs Teams: Detailed Comparison Table
Objective comparison for making an informed decision.
Criterion | Jitsi | Microsoft Teams | Advantage |
Implementation Simplicity | Instant, no accounts | Requires Microsoft 365 setup | 🏆 Jitsi |
Data Control | Full (self-hosted) | Limited by Microsoft policies | 🏆 Jitsi |
Economic Efficiency | Free/low cost | $6-12.50/month per user | 🏆 Jitsi |
Vendor Independence | Complete technological freedom | Tied to Microsoft ecosystem | 🏆 Jitsi |
Platform Openness | Open-source, auditable code | Proprietary closed solution | 🏆 Jitsi |
Corporate Functionality | Basic + integrations | Comprehensive out-of-box | 🏆 Teams |
Collaboration | Through integrations | Native with Office documents | 🏆 Teams |
Technical Support | Community | Professional Microsoft | 🏆 Teams |
Administration Simplicity | Requires expertise | Centralized through Admin Center | 🏆 Teams |
Corporate Standards Compliance | Configurable | Ready compliance certificates | 🏆 Teams |
Overall Score: Jitsi — 5 wins, Teams — 5 wins
Jitsi wins in independence, control, and economy. Teams excel in corporate integration and ready-made solutions.
Mymeet.ai: Meeting Analysis for Jitsi and Teams
Both platforms provide corporate communication capabilities but need a solution to extract strategic value from conducted meetings. Mymeet.ai solves this task for any platform with equal quality.
✅ Support for Jitsi and Microsoft Teams — automatic connection to meetings on any platform
✅ Unified corporate analysis standards — equally deep analysis regardless of system used
✅ Superior Russian speech quality — specialization in Russian corporate context
✅ Automatic corporate protocols — structured reports for various business meeting types
✅ Integration with corporate systems — synchronization with Russian CRM and document management
✅ Comparative platform analytics — communication effectiveness metrics for choice optimization
Case: IT Consulting Optimizes Corporate Communications
An IT consulting company (40 specialists) was choosing between Jitsi and Teams for corporate communications. Teams are attracted with ready integration, Jitsi — with independence and data control.
Strategic testing with mymeet.ai:
Parallel use of Jitsi for technical discussions, Teams for client presentations
Automatic analysis of decision-making effectiveness on different platforms
Comparison of corporate communication quality and team engagement
Assessment of platform choice impact on corporate culture
Strategic result: Hybrid model — Jitsi for internal processes ($4800/year savings), Teams for client interactions. Complete independence of internal data + professional image for clients.
Get strategic analytics of corporate communications. Contact a consultant through the form to set up analysis for your business processes.
When to Choose Jitsi Meet
Jitsi becomes the optimal choice for organizations with specific strategic priorities.
When Jitsi Outperforms Teams
Jitsi provides fundamental advantages that cannot be obtained within proprietary corporate ecosystems.
Organizations valuing technological independence. Complete freedom from Microsoft decisions, absence of vendor lock-in, ability to control every aspect of corporate communications without dependence on external policies.
Companies with data sovereignty requirements. Ability to audit all code, store confidential corporate data exclusively on own infrastructure, complete transparency of information processing.
International and distributed organizations. Absence of geopolitical risks, independence from American corporations and their international policies, ability to deploy in any jurisdiction.
Budget-oriented projects. Ability to direct Microsoft licensing savings toward core business development, especially critical for startups, non-profit organizations, educational institutions.
Types of Organizations for Choosing Jitsi
Certain categories of organizations gain strategic advantages from choosing Jitsi.
Technology companies with their own IT expertise
Government organizations with information security requirements
International NGOs and non-profit projects
Educational institutions of all levels
Startups and companies with limited IT budgets
Organizations in jurisdictions with restrictions on American technologies
When to Choose Teams
Teams are optimal for organizations that value ready-made integrated corporate solutions.
When Teams May Be Preferable
Teams offer a ready corporate ecosystem that can be critical for certain business models.
Corporations in the Microsoft ecosystem. If the organization has already invested in Microsoft 365, Exchange, SharePoint, then Teams ensures natural integration of all business processes without additional integration investments.
Organizations without their own IT expertise. Ready cloud solution with Microsoft professional support suits companies that prefer to focus on core activities instead of IT infrastructure administration.
Companies with intensive collaboration. Native integration with Office documents, task schedulers, corporate calendars can be critical for teams with a high degree of collaboration.
Types of Organizations for Teams
Teams are optimal for certain corporate structures and business processes.
Traditional corporations on Microsoft technologies
Financial organizations with requirements for ready compliance solutions
Consulting companies with intensive document work
Manufacturing companies with distributed offices
Migration Strategies Between Platforms
Transition between platforms requires strategic planning considering long-term corporate goals.
Transition from Teams to Jitsi: Gaining Independence
Such transition provides strategic advantages in the long term.
Strategic advantages of transition:
Complete technological independence from Microsoft ecosystem
Cardinal corporate budget savings on licenses
Full control over corporate data and infrastructure
No dependence on international corporate policies
Strategic migration planning:
Audit current Teams function usage
Assess internal IT expertise for administration
Choose optimal Jitsi deployment model
Phased transition preserving critical business processes
Transition from Jitsi to Teams: Ecosystem Integration
Such transition may be justified by changing corporate priorities.
Possible strategic reasons:
Need for deep integration with Microsoft corporate systems
Need for ready compliance solutions for regulated industries
Priority change from independence to operational efficiency
Lack of internal resources for open-source solution administration
Security and Corporate Compliance
Both platforms ensure corporate-level security, but with different approaches.
Jitsi Security: Transparency and Full Control
Jitsi's open-source nature ensures maximum transparency for corporate security requirements.
Strategic security advantages of Jitsi:
Complete code transparency for independent security audit
Control over entire corporate communication infrastructure
Independence from third-party corporate security policies
Ability to customize for specific industry requirements
Teams Security: Ready Corporate Standards
Teams use Microsoft's ready corporate security solutions.
Corporate security advantages of Teams:
Ready certificates of compliance with international standards
Microsoft professional security team
Automatic security updates without IT department participation
Integration with corporate authentication systems
Conclusion: Choose Your Strategy Consciously
Jitsi and Microsoft Teams represent two different corporate communication strategies. Jitsi ensures technological independence, full data control, and significant budget savings. Teams offers a ready integrated corporate ecosystem with professional support.
The choice between them is a choice of corporate philosophy: independence versus integration, control versus convenience, savings versus ready solutions. Evaluate organizational strategic priorities: is technological independence critical, is full data control important, are there resources for administering own solutions.
The right choice will determine IT strategy for years ahead and ensure compliance with corporate values and long-term goals.
Ready to make a strategic decision between Jitsi and Teams? Test both platforms in corporate scenarios and choose a solution that matches your organization's philosophy.
Frequently Asked Questions: Jitsi vs Teams
Which platform to choose for corporate communications — Jitsi or Teams?
Jitsi is optimal for organizations valuing technological independence, data control, budget savings, and having IT expertise. Teams are better for corporations in the Microsoft ecosystem needing ready integrated platforms without administration.
How much can you save by choosing Jitsi instead of Teams?
Jitsi is free for meet.jit.si, self-hosted costs $100-300/month for infrastructure. Teams require Microsoft 365 from $6/month per user. For a 50-person team, savings will be $3600-7500 per year choosing Jitsi.
Where is there more control over corporate data?
Jitsi provides full control with self-hosted deployment — you can audit all code, store data exclusively on your own infrastructure, and configure any security policies. Teams limit control with Microsoft policies.
What's easier to implement in an organization — Jitsi or Teams?
Jitsi is simpler for instant implementation — requires no corporate accounts, works through browsers with one click. Teams require Microsoft 365 subscription, account creation, but simpler for long-term corporate administration.
Which platform provides greater vendor independence?
Jitsi ensures complete technological independence — open-source code, no vendor lock-in, ability to change providers. Teams create dependence on Microsoft ecosystem and their corporate solutions.
Where are there more functions for corporate work?
Teams offers a comprehensive corporate platform: video conferencing, persistent channels, Office integration, task scheduler, corporate telephony. Jitsi focuses on video conferencing, additional functions through integrations.
Which platform is better for international companies?
Jitsi is better for international organizations — no geopolitical risks, independence from American corporations, ability to deploy in any jurisdiction. Teams may be subject to sanctions restrictions.
Where is technical support better — in Jitsi or Teams?
Teams offers Microsoft professional corporate support 24/7 with SLA guarantees. Jitsi relies on community support and documentation, but ensures complete transparency of problem solutions.
Can Jitsi and Teams be used simultaneously in an organization?
Yes, many organizations use hybrid strategy: Jitsi for internal communications and budget savings, Teams for integration with Microsoft systems. It is important to clearly separate corporate usage scenarios.
What IT expertise requirements for each platform?
Jitsi requires basic Linux administration skills for self-hosted deployment, but ensures full control. Teams require no technical expertise for use, all complexity hidden in Microsoft cloud.
Radzivon Alkhovik
Sep 15, 2025
