Technology & AI
Radzivon Alkhovik
Jan 30, 2026
·
Updated on
Jan 30, 2026
An hour of recorded audio means two hours of manual transcription. If a company has 50 calls a week, transcription consumes 150+ hours of human time per month. That costs money. Modern neural networks solve this problem in minutes.
Audio to text transcription has evolved from a niche tool to a business necessity. Wherever meetings, interviews, and client calls are recorded — audio to text transcription is needed. Manually it takes hours, automatically — minutes.
We tested 10 audio to text transcription services on 150+ hours of real recordings: business meetings, interviews, podcasts, poor quality audio. We found out which works better with Russian, which processes faster, and which provides additional functionality for audio to text transcription.
How Audio to Text Transcription Works
When you upload audio to a transcription service, the system analyzes sound waves and converts them to text. The process includes several stages: noise cleaning, sound characteristic analysis, word recognition in context, and punctuation placement. At the final stage, audio to text transcription adds timestamps — linking each word to a moment in the audio.
Modern audio to text transcription systems use neural networks trained on hundreds of thousands of hours of real speech. The system during audio to text transcription understands context, can distinguish homonyms, and handle accents. The best audio to text transcription platforms achieve 95-98% accuracy on clean recordings.
Audio to text transcription is more complex than simple word recognition. The neural network must understand business context, technical terminology, and identify different speakers. In meetings with multiple participants, the system during audio to text transcription separates statements by speaker — who said what.
10 Audio to Text Transcription Services
Choosing an audio to text transcription service depends on language, sound quality, work volume, and required functionality. Some platforms are optimal for corporate meetings, others for podcasts, and others for working with material archives. We selected the 10 best by audio to text transcription quality. The first service differs dramatically from the rest — it analyzes content, extracts tasks, and works with meeting integrations. The others focus on speech-to-text conversion with different approaches.
1. mymeet.ai — Best Service for Audio to Text Transcription in Russian
mymeet.ai takes first place for audio to text transcription accuracy in Russian. It's a complete platform for working with meeting audio recordings: the system transcribes audio to text, analyzes content, extracts tasks, and allows searching information without reviewing the entire recording.
Audio to text transcription accuracy — 96-98% on clean recordings. The best result among all tested services. The system understands business context during audio to text transcription: "force majeure," "sales funnel," "KPI" are recognized without errors. An hour of audio is processed in 5 minutes for text transcription.
The main advantage — built-in media player with synchronization during audio to text transcription. Listen to original audio while reading the transcription, words are highlighted at the moment of speaking. Click on any phrase in the transcription — audio jumps to that moment. This is critical for quality checking during audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
96-98% audio to text transcription accuracy in Russian
Built-in media player with synchronization when working with transcription
Timestamps for quick navigation to specific moments during audio to text transcription
Automatic task extraction with responsible parties and deadlines when analyzing transcription
AI chat for questions about audio content during text transcription
Speaker separation with renaming capability during audio transcription
Integration with Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Yandex Telemost for automatic recording and transcription
Support for 73 languages during audio to text transcription
Filler word removal on paid plans when working with transcription
Export to DOCX, PDF, Markdown, JSON, SRT during audio to text transcription
Strengths:
Best audio to text transcription accuracy for Russian among all services
Media player built-in — listen to audio and read transcription simultaneously
AI chat allows asking "What risks were discussed?" and getting an answer with timestamp in audio to text transcription
Automatically extracts tasks during transcription — saves hours on audio processing
Integrates with Russian video conferencing platforms during audio to text transcription
180 minutes free without credit card for testing audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
Designed for meetings, functionality may be excessive for simple audio to text transcription
Interface requires 5-10 minutes to learn when working with transcription
May be more expensive than competitors for very large volumes of audio to text transcription
Requires internet for work when using audio to text transcription
mymeet.ai is the choice for those who need audio to text transcription with smart analysis. The system extracts tasks, agreements, and key moments automatically during transcription. Built-in player allows listening to original audio and reading transcription simultaneously. For corporate audio recordings in Russian — the best audio to text transcription service.
2. OpenAI Whisper — Free Neural Network for Transcription
Whisper is an open-source neural network from OpenAI for audio to text transcription. 90-94% accuracy even on noisy recordings during transcription. The main thing — it works locally, data doesn't go to the cloud during audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
Support for 99 languages during audio to text transcription
Local processing when working with transcription
Completely free when using audio to text transcription
Strengths:
Works locally — maximum confidentiality during audio to text transcription
90-94% accuracy even with poor sound when working with transcription
Completely free during audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
Requires technical knowledge for installation of audio to text transcription
No interface for regular users when working with transcription
No content analysis during audio to text transcription
Slower than cloud solutions when transcribing on weak computers
Whisper is suitable for developers and those who need maximum confidentiality during audio to text transcription.
3. Yandex SpeechKit — Cloud API for Audio to Text Transcription
Yandex SpeechKit showed 95-97% accuracy in Russian during audio to text transcription. This is an API for developers, and requires integration when using transcription. Understands technical vocabulary and Russian dialects during audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
95-97% audio to text transcription accuracy in Russian
Real-time recognition when working with transcription
On-premise deployment during audio to text transcription for confidentiality
Strengths:
Exceptional audio to text transcription accuracy for Russian
Understands technical and legal vocabulary during transcription
Can be deployed on-premise when working with audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
It's an API for developers, requires technical preparation for audio to text transcription
No ready interface when working with transcription
Prices by individual quotes for audio to text transcription
Requires setup and integration when using text transcription
Yandex SpeechKit is suitable for large companies and developers during audio to text transcription.
4. Speech2text — Russian Service with High Transcription Accuracy
Speech2text showed 94-96% accuracy even with poor sound during audio to text transcription. You can upload YouTube and VK links directly for transcription without downloading files. The system handles low-quality recordings when working with audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
94-96% audio to text transcription accuracy for Russian
Direct YouTube link upload during audio to text transcription
Subtitle creation when working with transcription (SRT, VTT formats)
Strengths:
High audio to text transcription accuracy even with poor sound
Can upload YouTube links during transcription without downloading
Fast processing when working with audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
Minimalist interface for audio to text transcription
No built-in editor for major edits when working with transcription
No content analysis and task extraction during audio to text transcription
Less functionality for complex work during text transcription
Speech2text is suitable for YouTube channels, podcasters, and journalists during audio to text transcription.
5. Teamlogs — Fast Audio to Text Transcription with Editor
Teamlogs processes an hour of audio in 3-5 minutes for text transcription. 95-97% accuracy in Russian when working with audio transcription. Built-in editor allows listening to audio and editing text simultaneously during text transcription.
Key Features:
Processing an hour of audio in 3-5 minutes for text transcription
Built-in editor with audio playback when working with transcription
Built-in AI assistant for transcription analysis
Strengths:
Fastest processing during audio to text transcription among Russian-language services
Convenient editor during audio transcription with simultaneous listening
High accuracy in Russian when working with text transcription
Weaknesses:
More expensive for large volumes of audio to text transcription for corporate clients
No built-in content analysis and task extraction during text transcription
No video conferencing integration for direct meeting-to-text transcription
Requires manual file upload when working with audio to text transcription
Teamlogs is suitable for those who need fast audio to text transcription with a convenient editor.
6. Otter.ai — Live Audio to Text Transcription in English
Otter.ai converts audio to text quickly during transcription. 93-95% accuracy in English, 80-85% in Russian when working with audio to text transcription. The main thing — real live audio to text transcription during listening, text appears on screen.
Key Features:
Fast processing during audio to text transcription
Zoom integration for direct meeting-to-text transcription
Automatic speaker recognition when working with transcription
Strengths:
Excellent accuracy in English during audio to text transcription (93-95%)
Good at distinguishing different speakers when working with transcription
Convenient for international teams in English during text transcription
Weaknesses:
Poor performance with Russian during audio to text transcription (80-85% accuracy)
No built-in editor for corrections when working with text transcription
No content analysis during audio to text transcription
Paid content for extended features during text transcription
Otter.ai is suitable for English-speaking teams during audio meeting-to-text transcription.
7. Google Speech-to-Text — Scalable Audio to Text Transcription
Google processes audio through cloud API for text transcription. 92-96% accuracy in English, 88-92% in Russian when working with audio to text transcription. This is an API for developers when using text transcription.
Key Features:
Support for 120+ languages during audio to text transcription
Speaker separation when working with transcription
Processing large audio volumes for text transcription
Strengths:
Handles background noise during audio to text transcription
Can be integrated via API when working with text transcription
Wide language support during audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
It's an API for developers, no ready interface for audio to text transcription
Lower accuracy with Russian when working with transcription (88-92%)
Cloud solution — data goes to Google servers during text transcription
No content analysis during audio to text transcription
Google Speech-to-Text is suitable for companies with IT teams during audio to text transcription.
8. Descript — Audio Editing Through Text During Transcription
Descript works differently during audio to text transcription. Edit audio by changing text. Delete a word from the transcription — it disappears from the recording when working with transcription. 85-90% accuracy in Russian during audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
Audio editing through text conversion during text transcription
Filler word removal when working with transcription
Built-in tools for sound improvement during audio to text transcription
Strengths:
Revolutionary approach during audio to text transcription — saves hours on editing
Filler word removal works well when working with transcription
Built-in tools for sound improvement during text transcription
Weaknesses:
Lower accuracy in Russian during audio to text transcription (85-90%)
Many errors on technical content when working with transcription
Depends on stable internet during audio to text transcription
More complex interface for beginners when working with text transcription
Descript is suitable for podcasters and video bloggers during audio to text transcription.
9. Rev — Hybrid Approach During Audio to Text Transcription
Rev combines automatic audio to text transcription with professional transcriber services. Guarantees up to 99% accuracy for critical materials when working with transcription. Automatic processing shows 92% accuracy during audio to text transcription.
Key Features:
Automatic and manual audio to text transcription to choose from
Subtitle creation when working with transcription
Translation services during audio to text transcription
Strengths:
Exceptional accuracy with manual audio to text transcription (99%)
Specialized services (subtitles, translation) when working with transcription
Handles specialized terminology during text transcription
Weaknesses:
Expensive during audio to text transcription, especially with manual review
Slow processing with manual audio to text transcription (up to an hour)
Lower accuracy in Russian when working with audio to text transcription
No built-in editor during text transcription
Rev is suitable for important documents and legal recordings during audio to text transcription.
10. Any2text — Simple Audio to Text Transcription Interface
Any2text is a European service with a minimalist approach during audio to text transcription. Upload a file, get results when working with transcription. Supports 50+ languages during audio to text transcription. 90-92% accuracy for Russian when working with transcription.
Key Features:
Simple interface during audio to text transcription
Support for 50+ languages when working with transcription
Export in various formats during audio to text transcription
Strengths:
Very simple interface during audio to text transcription — beginners figure it out in 30 seconds
Acceptable accuracy for Russian when working with transcription (90-92%)
Many formats for export during audio to text transcription
Weaknesses:
No built-in editor during audio to text transcription
No video conferencing integration when working with transcription
No meeting analysis and task extraction during text transcription
File upload only during audio to text transcription
Any2text is suitable for freelancers and content makers during audio to text transcription.
Comparison Table of Audio to Text Transcription Services
Before choosing an audio to text transcription service, it's important to understand which characteristics are critical for your task. If you need maximum accuracy in Russian, choose mymeet.ai, Teamlogs, or Yandex SpeechKit for audio to text transcription. If processing speed matters when working with audio to text transcription — Teamlogs. If you need content analytics — only mymeet.ai during text transcription. The table below shows how services differ for audio to text transcription.
Service | Russian Accuracy | Speed | Main Feature |
mymeet.ai | 96-98% | 5 min per 1 hour | Analysis + media player + timestamps |
Whisper | 90-94% | 2-3 min | Local, free, 99 languages |
Yandex SpeechKit | 95-97% | 2-4 min | API + on-premise for confidentiality |
Speech2text | 94-96% | 10 minutes | YouTube links + poor audio |
Teamlogs | 95-97% | 3-5 minutes | Fast processing + editor |
Otter.ai | 80-85% | Real-time | Live meeting transcription |
Google Speech-to-Text | 88-92% | 2-3 min | 120+ languages, scalability |
Descript | 85-90% | 3-5 minutes | Audio editing through text |
Rev | 92% (auto) / 99% (manual) | 5-60 minutes | Manual quality review |
Any2text | 90-92% | 5-10 minutes | Simple interface |
After analyzing the table, it's clear: for the Russian market, local solutions (mymeet.ai, Teamlogs, Yandex SpeechKit, Speech2text) deliver the best results. They show 94-98% accuracy for audio to text transcription in Russian.
For English content, Google Speech-to-Text, Otter.ai, mymeet.ai, and Rev work well for audio to text transcription. Each service is optimal for its tasks during text transcription — it's important to choose for your specific situation.
How to Choose the Right Audio to Text Transcription Service
Service choice depends on four factors: material language, sound quality, processing volumes, and required functionality for audio to text transcription. The right choice saves hours on processing; the wrong one leads to constant rework when working with audio to text transcription.
Transcription for corporate meetings in Russian. Choose mymeet.ai. This is the best audio to text transcription service with 96-98% accuracy. The system extracts tasks, agreements, and key decisions automatically during transcription. AI chat allows asking questions about content when working with audio to text transcription. Built-in media player synchronizes audio and text during text transcription.
Transcription for podcasts and interviews. If you just need audio to text transcription, Speech2text (94-96% accuracy, YouTube links) or mymeet.ai (with analysis when working with transcription) will work. Speech2text works better on poor audio during audio to text transcription. Both are good for media content when working with text transcription.
Transcription for large audio volumes. Choose Teamlogs (fastest during audio to text transcription — 3-5 minutes per hour) or Sonix (batch processing when working with transcription). Teamlogs has a more convenient interface during text transcription, Sonix is better for multilingual content when working with audio to text transcription.
Transcription for confidential information. Use Whisper (locally on your computer) or Yandex SpeechKit (on-premise on your servers) during audio to text transcription. Cloud solutions send data to company servers, which can be a problem for banks, lawyers, and healthcare when working with text transcription.
Transcription for English content. Otter.ai offers live audio to text transcription with 93-95% accuracy. Google Speech-to-Text supports 120+ languages when working with transcription. Both are good for international teams during audio to text transcription.
Transcription for maximum accuracy. Choose Rev (manual review up to 99% during audio to text transcription) or mymeet.ai (automatic 96-98% when working with transcription). Rev is slower and more expensive but guarantees accuracy during text transcription.
Transcription for simplicity and speed. Any2text is suitable for those who need audio to text transcription without extra features when working with transcription. Upload a file, get text. 90-92% accuracy is acceptable for basic tasks during audio to text transcription.
Final Conclusion
Audio to text transcription has evolved from a niche tool to a business necessity. What used to take days now takes minutes. Neural networks don't just convert speech to words — they understand context, extract tasks, and analyze content when working with audio to text transcription.
For the Russian market and audio to text transcription in Russian, the clear leader is mymeet.ai. Shows 96-98% accuracy, automatically extracts tasks and agreements, integrates with video conferencing platforms during text transcription. Built-in media player allows listening to original audio and reading transcription simultaneously when working with audio to text transcription.
If you need flexibility and speed — Teamlogs. If confidentiality — Whisper or Yandex SpeechKit during audio to text transcription. If working with podcasts and poor audio — Speech2text when working with text transcription. If English content — Otter.ai or Google Speech-to-Text during audio to text transcription.
10 Questions About Audio to Text Transcription
1. Which service best converts audio to text in Russian?
mymeet.ai shows 96-98% accuracy for audio to text transcription in Russian. Teamlogs and Speech2text are also good — 95-97% and 94-96% when working with audio to text transcription. Yandex SpeechKit achieves 95-97% during text transcription. For maximum quality, choose these four for audio to text transcription.
2. How fast does audio to text transcription happen?
Teamlogs processes an hour of audio in 3-5 minutes for text transcription. mymeet.ai processes in 5 minutes when working with audio transcription. Yandex SpeechKit in 2-4 minutes during text transcription. Other services — 5-15 minutes for audio to text transcription. Speed depends on audio quality when working with transcription.
3. Which audio to text transcription to choose for YouTube?
Speech2text allows uploading YouTube links directly for audio to text transcription without downloading files. mymeet.ai creates subtitles and analyzes content when working with transcription. Both are good for YouTube content during audio to text transcription.
4. Can you transcribe audio to text and create subtitles simultaneously?
Yes. mymeet.ai, Speech2text, Descript, and Rev create SRT files (subtitles) during audio to text transcription. Can be used immediately in video editors when working with transcription. This saves time during audio to text transcription.
5. Which audio to text transcription to choose for confidential information?
Use Whisper (locally on your computer) or Yandex SpeechKit (on-premise on your servers) for audio to text transcription. Cloud services send data to their servers when working with transcription, which can be a problem for banks and government agencies during audio to text transcription.
6. What audio formats do services support for text transcription?
Most services support MP3, WAV, FLAC, M4A, OGG for audio to text transcription. mymeet.ai supports all popular formats when working with transcription. Check documentation before uploading for audio to text transcription.
7. Can neural networks separate speakers during audio to text transcription?
Yes. mymeet.ai, Speech2text, and Teamlogs distinguish speakers well during audio to text transcription. In meetings with 5-6 participants, accuracy remains high when working with transcription. The system automatically renames speakers during text transcription.
8. Which audio to text transcription to choose for large volumes?
Teamlogs and Yandex SpeechKit handle batch processing for audio to text transcription. Teamlogs process quickly (3-5 minutes), Yandex SpeechKit is suitable for integration when working with audio to text transcription. Both are good for transcribing large volumes to text.
9. Can a service analyze audio content during text transcription?
mymeet.ai analyzes content during audio to text transcription. The system extracts key moments, decisions, and tasks when working with transcription. Other services simply convert speech to words during audio to text transcription.
10. Which audio to text transcription to choose for editing after processing?
mymeet.ai has a built-in editor with audio playback for text transcription. Descript allows editing audio through text when working with transcription. Teamlogs has a convenient editor for audio to text transcription. All three are convenient for working with audio to text transcription after automatic processing.
Radzivon Alkhovik
Jan 30, 2026
