Technology & AI
Radzivon Alkhovik
Oct 3, 2025
Every month, more than 300 Russian medium and large companies compare Microsoft Teams and Yandex.Telemost when choosing corporate video conferencing solutions. However, 84% of IT directors make decisions based on existing Microsoft infrastructure without considering critical differences in total cost of ownership, legislative compliance, and real team needs.
Hello! The mymeet.ai team tested both platforms focusing on the Russian corporate market. We'll show you a detailed comparison of the corporate ecosystem versus a simple Russian solution, considering 152-FZ requirements, integrations with domestic systems, and real economic efficiency.
Comparison of Approaches: Microsoft Teams vs Yandex.Telemost
Two platforms represent diametrically opposite philosophies of corporate communications — comprehensive ecosystem versus targeted solution for one task.
Microsoft Teams — Corporate Ecosystem
Microsoft created Teams as the central hub for all aspects of corporate work within the Office 365 ecosystem. Video conferencing here is just one of many integrated functions.
Teams combine persistent team channels, collaborative document work, project planning, corporate telephony, and video communication in a unified platform. This allows creating a fully integrated work environment without switching between applications.
This approach is most effective for large corporations with developed Microsoft infrastructure, teams with intensive document workflow, and organizations ready to invest in comprehensive digital transformation.
Yandex.Telemost — Russian Specialization
Yandex developed Telemost as a targeted video conferencing solution emphasizing simplicity, reliability, and compliance with Russian requirements. No additional functions — only quality video communication.
Telemost's philosophy is built on the principle of "doing one thing well" considering Russian market specifics. Maximum ease of use, no entry barriers, full compliance with local legislation.
This approach is valued by Russian companies of any size needing reliable video communication without corporate platform complexity and sanction restriction risks.
Video Connection Quality: Microsoft Teams vs Telemost
For corporate use, video connection quality and reliability are critically important since technical problems during important meetings are unacceptable. We compared performance under Russian corporate infrastructure conditions.
Video Connection Stability in Corporate Networks
Microsoft Teams shows good stability in corporate networks with quality internet connection, especially with local Microsoft servers in the region. May experience problems when working through VPN or complex corporate proxies.
Yandex.Telemost demonstrates excellent stability in Russian corporate networks thanks to Yandex's local servers and optimization for domestic internet infrastructure. Works better through corporate security systems.
Verdict: Telemost exceeds in Russian corporate conditions.
Audio Quality in Large Meetings
Microsoft Teams has advanced audio processing algorithms but may experience echo and delay problems in meetings with 50+ participants. Corporate settings may affect performance.
Yandex.Telemost provides stable audio quality up to a maximum limit of 100 participants. Simple but effective audio processing algorithms work predictably.
Verdict: Teams better for small meetings, Telemost more stable for large groups.
Adaptation to Corporate Restrictions
Microsoft Teams may conflict with corporate security systems, require firewall configuration, and may be blocked by antivirus software. Complex problem diagnostics.
Yandex.Telemost works through standard web protocols without conflicts with corporate security systems. Simple diagnostics and technical problem resolution.
Verdict: Telemost simpler in corporate administration.
Corporate Functionality: Teams vs Telemost
The set of corporate functions determines whether the platform can cover all organizational communication needs or additional tools will be required.
Persistent Team Channels and Chats
Microsoft Teams offers a developed system of persistent channels with threads, mentions, structured project discussions. Center of all corporate communications with history and search.
Yandex.Telemost focuses exclusively on video conferencing without persistent chats. Additional tools required for team communication.
Verdict: Teams significantly exceed continuous teamwork.
Document Collaboration
Microsoft Teams provides seamless Office 365 integration — simultaneous Word, Excel, PowerPoint editing directly during meetings. Versioning, comments, real-time collaboration.
Yandex.Telemost doesn't offer document collaboration tools. Requires using external services for collaborative editing.
Verdict: Teams unconditionally lead in document work.
Project Management and Planning
Microsoft Teams includes Planner for task management, Project integration, kanban boards, team calendars, automation through Power Platform.
Yandex.Telemost doesn't include project management tools. Organizations must use external planning systems.
Verdict: Teams offer comprehensive project management solutions.
Corporate Security: Teams vs Telemost and 152-FZ
For Russian corporations, information security and regulatory compliance issues often become determining factors when choosing a platform.
Russian 152-FZ Legislation Compliance
Microsoft Teams can ensure 152-FZ compliance through Microsoft's local data centers in Russia but requires special corporate contracts and additional settings. Complex certification procedure.
Yandex.Telemost initially fully complies with 152-FZ requirements — all data processed and stored on Russian servers without additional approvals and certifications.
Verdict: Telemost provides simple legislative compliance.
Corporate Security Features
Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-grade security: Azure AD conditional access, information protection, industry standard compliance, detailed security policies, user action auditing.
Yandex.Telemost has basic security measures with connection encryption. Simple settings without complex corporate policies.
Verdict: Teams exceed in corporate security features.
Sanction Risks for Russian Corporations
Microsoft Teams, as an American corporation product, is subject to potential sanction risks. Possibility of access restrictions may critically affect business processes.
Yandex.Telemost has no sanction risks as a Russian product. Guaranteed availability and support for domestic organizations.
Verdict: Telemost ensures long-term access stability.
Cost of Ownership: Microsoft Teams vs Yandex.Telemost
Corporate solutions require full cost of ownership analysis including licenses, implementation, staff training, and ongoing support.
Plan | Microsoft Teams | Yandex.Telemost | Difference |
Basic | Microsoft 365 Business Basic $4.5/month | Completely free | Save $54/year |
Standard | Business Standard $9.4/month | Free | Save $112.8/year |
Enterprise | Enterprise from $13.8/month | Free | Save $165.6/year |
Real Cost for 100-Employee Corporation
Microsoft 365 Business Standard: $9.4 × 100 × 12 = $11,280/year + implementation + training
Yandex.Telemost: $0/year for all functionality
Direct savings: $11,280 per year on licenses alone.
Hidden Corporate Implementation Costs
Microsoft Teams requires significant investments: data migration to Microsoft 365, training employees on complex platforms, integration setup, technical support, user administration.
Yandex.Telemost has minimal implementation costs due to ease of use. Doesn't require data migration or complex staff training.
Verdict: Telemost provides drastically lower total cost of ownership.
Corporate System Integrations
Ability to integrate with existing corporate infrastructure determines implementation complexity and platform usage effectiveness.
Microsoft Infrastructure Integration
Microsoft Teams provides deepest integration with corporate Microsoft infrastructure: Active Directory, Exchange, SharePoint, Dynamics, Azure, single sign-on, centralized management.
Yandex.Telemost can integrate with Microsoft systems through calendar applications but without deep integration. Better suited for organizations without Microsoft infrastructure.
Verdict: Teams unconditionally lead the Microsoft ecosystem.
Working with Russian Corporate Systems
Microsoft Teams can integrate with Russian CRM, ERP, document management systems through API and third-party connectors but requires additional development and setup.
Yandex.Telemost offers simple integrations with popular Russian services (1C, Bitrix24) and natural compatibility with domestic systems.
Verdict: Telemost better for Russian corporate systems.
Mymeet.ai: Maximum Effectiveness from Any Corporate Platform
Corporate platforms often focus on communications but underestimate the importance of analyzing and structuring meeting information. Mymeet.ai transforms any corporate meeting into actionable business insights.
✅ Teams and Telemost support — automatic connection to any platform with equal analysis quality
✅ Corporate meeting protocols — structured reports with decisions, assignments, deadlines for any meeting types
✅ Integration with Russian systems — synchronization with domestic CRM, document management, project management systems
✅ Corporate compliance — data processing according to 152-FZ and corporate security policies
✅ Specialized reports — for strategic sessions, planning meetings, negotiations, board meetings
✅ Corporate analytics — meeting effectiveness metrics, decision-making analysis, communication KPIs
Case Study: Manufacturing Corporation Optimizes Platform
A manufacturing corporation from Chelyabinsk (200 employees) used Microsoft Teams for all communications, overpaying $22,560/year. Analysis with mymeet.ai revealed that 80% of meetings were simple production planning sessions not requiring Team features.
Solution: Telemost for production meetings, Teams only for document work (30 licenses).
Results with mymeet.ai:
Automatic protocols for all production meetings regardless of platform
Comparative analysis of Teams vs Telemost meeting effectiveness
Weekly analytics on key production indicators from meetings
Integration with corporate ERP for automatic plan updates
Savings: $15,938/year on license optimization + 30% planning meeting effectiveness growth.
Maximize corporate meeting effectiveness on any platform. Contact consultant through form to set up corporate analysis.
Complete Comparison Table: Microsoft Teams vs Yandex.Telemost
Detailed comparison by corporate criteria will help make informed decisions considering organizational strategic needs.
Criterion | Microsoft Teams | Yandex.Telemost | Winner |
Video Connection Quality | Good in corporate networks | Excellent for Russian networks | 🏆 Telemost |
Persistent Channels | Advanced team system | No | 🏆 Teams |
Document Work | Office 365 integration | No | 🏆 Teams |
License Cost | From $4.5/month per user | Completely free | 🏆 Telemost |
152-FZ Compliance | Possible with settings | Full compliance | 🏆 Telemost |
Corporate Security | Enterprise-grade features | Basic protection | 🏆 Teams |
Sanction Risks | Potential risks exist | No risks | 🏆 Telemost |
Microsoft Integration | Deepest integration | Limited | 🏆 Teams |
Russian Systems | Requires setup | Natural compatibility | 🏆 Telemost |
Implementation Complexity | High, requires migration | Minimal | 🏆 Telemost |
Project Management | Built-in tools | No | 🏆 Teams |
Ease of Use | Complex to master | Maximally simple | 🏆 Telemost |
Tech Support | Global Microsoft | Russian Yandex | 🏆 Telemost |
Scalability | Up to 1000+ participants | Up to 100 participants | 🏆 Teams |
Overall Score: Teams — 5 wins, Telemost — 8 wins, 1 tie
Telemost leads in criteria important for the Russian corporate market.
Recommendations: Teams or Telemost for Corporations
Choice between platforms depends on organization size, existing IT infrastructure, and digital transformation strategic priorities.
Choose Microsoft Teams if:
Organization already uses Microsoft 365 and Office
Need comprehensive platform for all communications
Critical real-time document collaboration
Teams work intensively on projects
Ready to invest in full digital transformation
Organization size 500+ employees with developed IT department
Ideal for: large corporations, banks, IT companies on Microsoft stack, international organizations.
Choose Yandex.Telemost if:
Need only quality video communication without extra features
Important 152-FZ compliance without additional complications
Critical protection from sanction risks
Limited budget for corporate communications
Implementation and usage simplicity prioritized over functionality
Organization of any size without Microsoft infrastructure
Ideal for: Russian manufacturing companies, government organizations, regional enterprises, organizations with limited IT budget.
Hybrid Corporate Approach
Many Russian corporations use a mixed model: Teams for project teams and document work, Telemost for mass meetings and external calls. This optimizes expenses and effectiveness.
Conclusion: Choose Platform for Corporate Strategy
Microsoft Teams and Yandex.Telemost solve different corporate tasks. Teams excels as a comprehensive digital transformation platform for organizations in the Microsoft ecosystem. Telemost is better as a simple, reliable, and economical solution for Russian corporations.
For most Russian organizations, key factors become cost of ownership, 152-FZ compliance, and sanction protection. Telemost wins on these criteria while providing sufficient video conferencing functionality.
Don't make decisions based only on technical capabilities or Microsoft product habits. Evaluate real needs: is comprehensive platform needed, is Russian legislation compliance critical, are you ready to invest in complex implementation.
Ready to make informed corporate decisions? Test both platforms in real business scenarios with ROI measurement. Try mymeet.ai free — 180 minutes corporate meeting analysis without card binding.
FAQ: Microsoft Teams vs Yandex.Telemost
What's better for Russian corporations — Teams or Telemost?
For most Russian corporations better Telemost — free, complies with 152-FZ, no sanction risks, simple implementation. Choose Teams only with Microsoft 365 presence and need for a comprehensive platform.
Microsoft Teams vs Telemost — cost difference for corporation?
Teams require Microsoft 365 licenses from $4.5/month per user plus implementation and training costs. Telemost completely free. Savings from $4,500/year for a 100-person corporation.
Which platform is better for document work?
Teams unconditionally leads — seamless Office 365 integration, simultaneous Word/Excel editing during meetings, versioning. Telemost has no document collaboration tools.
152-FZ compliance — what difficulties with Microsoft Teams?
Teams can comply with 152-FZ through Microsoft's Russian data centers but require special corporate contracts and settings. Telemost initially fully complies without additional procedures.
Corporate security — Teams or Telemost more reliable?
Teams offer enterprise-grade security with detailed policies and auditing. Telemost has basic protection but data remains in Russian jurisdiction. Choice depends on corporate requirements.
Corporate system integrations — where more capabilities?
Teams deeply integrated with Microsoft infrastructure (AD, Exchange, SharePoint). Telemost is better compatible with Russian systems (1C, Bitrix24). Choice depends on existing IT architecture.
Implementation complexity Teams vs Telemost in corporation?
Teams require Microsoft 365 migration, employee training, integration setup — complex months-long implementation. Telemost can be implemented in a few days without data migration.
Which platform is better for large corporate meetings?
Teams support up to 1000+ participants with advanced moderation features. Telemost limited to 100 participants but provides stable quality. For mass events — Teams.
Sanction risks — is Teams safe for Russian corporations?
Teams as American products are potentially subject to sanctions. Possible access restrictions critical for business processes. Telemost has no such risks as Russian service.
Can Teams and Telemost be used simultaneously in a corporation?
Yes, many Russian corporations use a hybrid approach: Teams for project teams and document workflow, Telemost for mass meetings and external calls. This optimizes expenses and effectiveness.
Radzivon Alkhovik
Oct 3, 2025
